Kentucky
County Clerk Kim Davis, who spent five days in jail for defying federal court
orders and refusing same-sex marriage licenses, was given tickets to the
president's final State of the Union address, an invitation-only event. Why?
Regardless if
her religious beliefs are right or wrong she is divisive. Congressman Jim
Jordan of Ohio, who leads the conservative House Freedom Caucus, acknowledged
that his staff gave Davis a ticket. Was it a childish ‘tit for tat’ political move because First lady Michelle
Obama invited Jim Obergefell, lead plaintiff in the case in which the United
States Supreme Court effectively legalized gay marriage across the nation. A
lot of our politicians and religious leaders act like school yard bullies. They
continue to perpetrates ‘us vs them’ in America.
After the
Supreme Court's decision, Kim Davis cited "God's authority" and
refused to issue marriage licenses, despite a series of federal court orders.
She quickly became the hero of some in the religious right. Politicians,
including presidential candidates Ted Cruz and Mike Huckabee, flocked to a
rally on the jailhouse lawn during her brief stay behind bars to be seen
supporting her in hopes of gaining a few votes. The very two candidates that
complain the most on Fox News that President Obama does not obey the law or the
constitution was supporting someone who advocated breaking the law.
Mat Staver,
founder of the law firm Liberty Counsel that advocates against gay rights, said
he and Davis would be seated in the House chamber "to stand for
religious freedom and to represent Judeo-Christian values." Whose
religious freedoms were they representing and whose Christian values were they
representing – not mine! Kim Davis violated the First Amendment by
trying to force her religious belief on everyone. Kim Davis violated a ruling
of the United States Supreme Court. Kim Davis violated a number of legal court
orders.
Where was
Mat Staver? I guess he had a better seat because he was not shown with Kim
Davis. Kim Davis is nothing more than a pawn being used by some in the
religious right.
She took an
oath of office to serve the people of Rowan County she violated that oath. A
Christian who felt they were being forced to violate their religious beliefs should
have resigned, not violated her oath and not violated the law of the land. I
would have respected her resignation, but I do not respect her defiance of the
law. I think Jesus said, “Give therefore to the emperor the things that are the
emperor’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” The law of the land belongs
to the ‘emperor’ not any particular religious group. Kim Davis took an oath
in order to work for the ‘emperor’.
She chose
to work for the government and she vowed to uphold the law and serve people. When
you take an oath for the ‘emperor’, you are also swearing to play by the ‘emperor’s’
rules. If you do not like the rules you try to bring about changes in the
rules. You do not ignore them or disobey them. That is what Obama does and
people like Kim Davis do not like it, nor do I.
Kim Davis
is no Rosa Parks. It
does not advance Christians in the public arena to have one of our own
attempting to enforce her illegal bigotry and then being rallied around like a
modern-day Joan of Arc by our religious leaders. Kim Davis is not a hero;
she is a law-breaker, a criminal and a poor role model for Christians.
Kim Davis
told a reporter on Tuesday that she attended, Obama's State of the Union
address to provide "encouragement" to "all Christians."
What is she trying to encourage us to do – revolt, disobey the law, ignore laws
we do not like or disregard our promise and oaths? If Kim Davis can violate her
oath then why is it wrong for Obama to do the same? If Christians are going to
glorify Kim Davis for ignoring the laws she does not like then we not attack
Obama when he does the same.
The three
Supreme Court Justices who dissented to marriage equality and who probably did
not approve of Obama’s childish attack on the Supreme Court in the 2015 State
of the Union — Justices Samuel Alito,
Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas — showed class and maturity by not attending
Obama’s address. Their absence spoke louder than Kim Davis’ presence.
Let us not forget Kim Davis does not always tell the truth, she has a tendency to embellish
the truth. Do you remember she and her attorney once boasted of a private meeting with Pope
Francis and he embraced her and blessed her? The Vatican later clarified the secret
rendezvous was a public meet-and-greet with Pope Francis where a dozen or
more participated.
If
homosexuals are allowed to marry or not in no way “tramples” on my religious
liberties as Kim Davis stated. I am not forced to participate in same sex
marriages; I am not forced to change my religious beliefs one way or the other;
my denomination is not being forced to perform same sex marriages. I’ve become
increasingly convinced that there is no Biblical justification for Kim Davis’
disobedience of the law.
I stand by
my claim that government officials who fail to enforce the law are not
practicing civil disobedience, but instead are simply violating the rule of law
and their sworn obligation to enforce it. They are not forced to hold office or
work for the government. They have an option to enforcing a law they do not
like — they can resign and then take their cause to the media.
I do not
have to do business with someone who uses their freedom of speech to say things
that disagree with my religious beliefs. Likewise, I would personally argue
that Christian business owners should not have to perform services that
they believe violate their religious beliefs. If I felt strongly enough about
it I should be trying to get likeminded people to get the Civil Rights Law
changed. Unfortunately, I do not have an alternative law that I think would
work better. If not forced some business owners would discriminate against
race, gender, weight, height, religion, etc.
Kim Davis is a paid government
employee, paid by all taxpayers, she is does not own the County Clerks office.
Let us not forget that the Civil Rights Laws are PRIMARILY the results of Southern States (some Christians) refusing to end discrimination against blacks in business, schools and CHURCHES on their own. They had to be forced to do what was right and it was a bloody brutal battle to accomplish it.
Let us not forget that the Civil Rights Laws are PRIMARILY the results of Southern States (some Christians) refusing to end discrimination against blacks in business, schools and CHURCHES on their own. They had to be forced to do what was right and it was a bloody brutal battle to accomplish it.
We Christians
cannot appeal to the authority of the Constitution or laws when it suits us,
but take the law into our own hands when we do not like the determinations of
governmental authorities. This does not mean we should violate our consciences
or the higher laws of God, but it means we suffer the consequences of conflict
between faith and law respectfully, remembering that God’s kingdom is not of
this world.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.