I do not
understand why society believes abortion and euthanasia is such a dichotomy. Both,
involve taking a life. One is taking
your own life and the other is taking the life of another. It seems to me that
abortion (taking the life of another) is far
worse than voluntary euthanasia, the ending of your own life, when you
no longer want to contend with constant physical suffering and your life
quality is zero. Yet, people vote to
make abortion legal, the Supreme Court of the United States upholds abortion
laws making it legal and society will flock to the streets in masses if legal
abortion is ever in danger of being overturned.
Abortion is
taking the life of an innocent person that has no say in the matter. Voluntary euthanasia is taking your own life
and you make the choice. Yes, I concede non-voluntary euthanasia is wrong just as I believe abortion
is wrong.
People argue
voluntary euthanasia will lead to non-voluntary euthanasia. Abortion of babies in the mother’s womb has
not led to killing children outside the womb. So, how can one argue on that basis one is
wrong and the other is okay. If one is
morally or ethically wrong then both are.
I do not hold that it is an issue of morality or ethics when speaking of
voluntary euthanasia.
People who
are "pro-life" are generally opposed to anyone taking any life - even their own - for
any reason.
But, what is life without quality? I have diabetes, in the final stage of heart
failure, kidney failure, and COPD (lungs failing). I am in constant pain, I cannot walk five
steps without breathing spasms and basically confined to sitting. To
me that is not life! I have been told by all my doctors my
condition cannot be cured, it will never get better, it will get worse and all
they can to is try to SLOW the progression.
That is not very comforting to me and I do not know anyone in their
right mind that would applaud a doctors effort to prolong their suffering. Now, I can stop the seventeen plus
medications and suffer even more to achieve a solution – I guess. If it is God’s will I believe I would live
with or without the medication.
Am I a
coward, of course I am. I want to end my
life quickly and not have it drag on for days, weeks, months or even years
before it happens by removing medication.
I really see no honor in being afraid to die and choosing to be a burden
on those around me. I have cared for two
people that suffered for years, my mother and my uncle. I could not have possibly loved my mother
more than I did and I have no regrets for taking care of her, but was it
extremely difficult – yes it was! Did I
ever have thoughts that I wished her suffering would end – yes I did and then I
would feel guilt for weeks for having such a thought.
I believe before
any act of euthanasia may be committed the suffering person must make some kind
of assessment of the value of their life with the assistance of medical
professionals, mental professionals and legal professionals. There should be a waiting period involved to
guarantee that someone does not wake up one day and decide this is a good day
to die.
The practice of euthanasia is Biblically wrong
because it violates the principle that life is given by God. God does not
approve of “hands that shed innocent blood” (Proverbs 6:16-17). Life comes from
God. It is God’s decision to give life and to take it away (Ecclesiastes 12:7;
Job 1:21). In the Bible, shedding innocent blood is called murder (1 John 3:15;
Genesis 9:6). I do not need ten thousand replies telling me what the Bible says
about the subject.
The death of
King Saul an example of euthanasia or suicide? (1 Samuel 31:1-6). Saul did not
want the Philistines to find him alive, because he knew they would torture him.
He asked his armor bearer to kill him. When the armor bearer refused, Saul fell
on his own sword and died. Saul committed suicide, but he did it in order to
avoid suffering at the hands of his enemy. He murdered himself to prevent
suffering prior to it happening and therefore was guilty of sin in my eyes.
(Exodus 20:13).
I have a
difficult time relating killing yourself because you do not want to be taken by
your enemy and suffering from a physical disease without any hope of ever
getting better. You may say that I am
greedy, but I have worked and saved all my life and I have no desire to give
all my money to doctors and hospitals and pharmaceutical companies when before
I die I could give it to the poor.
My father
worked hard all his life and saved for his retirement and my education . The last eleven days of his life he beg my
mother and I to let him die and stop giving everything he had planned on my
mother and I having to doctors when we all knew it was hopeless. Of course we could not or would not end
treatment and in the end we went from being a high middle class family to
poverty. His final hospital bill was
275,000 dollars, a lot of money in 1958.
The experiments like inserting a pigs valve in his heart did not help
him and it has not help me now that I suffer as he did.
I know some
Christians are thinking not all suffering is bad. Even though we may not always understand why
we suffer, some good can come from it. The apostle Paul understood this (2
Corinthians 12:7-10). He had a “thorn in the flesh” which he asked God to
remove, but he was made to realize it was for his good. Job is also an
excellent example of this point (James 5:11).
I would be lying if I said I have not learned from my suffering for I
have. That does not mean I want to
continue to suffer.
Do not tell
me I do not respect human life. I have
been told when people understand and respect the sanctity of human life, they
will not vote to end it. You want to end
it if you respect the life of your loved ones that are also suffering because
of you.
I view euthanasia
as the end of suffering when there is no hope of ever recovering from the
illness and you are in need of life support (mechanical or medicinal) in order
to barely hang on to life, it would be beneficial for both the patient and his/her
family members to just let them go. By
allowing them to die peacefully, painlessly and quickly. They will die on their own terms, rather than
forcing them to live and let the disease slowly kill them.
I recognize
the negatives of euthanasia and that is it could be abused by physicians and
others who have the power to use this method of ending life. And more
importantly, though the chances of recovery from certain diseases may be
minimal, it is a known fact that some overcome this mountainous feat. That is why I feel strongly only the suffering
victim should be able to make the choice.
My niece was advised to remove all life support from my sister because
she only had days to live, but my niece refused. She continued to live three years most of it
spent in a hospital and suffering.
Don’t insult
me as one person did by saying a teenager that flunks a test or fails to make
the football team may be suffering as much as I am and ask me would I say he
has the right to end his life because he is suffering. I will tell you as I told the person who said
that to me – “You are a fool”.
I feel
obligated to tell Catholic what our church says about euthanasia - So-called
“mercy killing” and the efforts of the Hemlock Society and the late Dr. Jack
Kevorkian to make euthanasia socially acceptable are condemned by the Church.
God alone
should decide when someone leaves this earth — not the patient, doctor, or
caretaker. Keeping the dying patient pain-free, comfortable, clean, nourished,
and hydrated — and just allowing the
natural death process to take its course — is how human beings die with dignity. In other words if you die a miserable death
you die with dignity and God is well pleased – I guess that is how they
feel. Our church always thought it was
good for people to suffer.
When death
is thought imminent; the ordinary care owed to a sick person cannot be
legitimately interrupted. The use of painkillers to alleviate the sufferings of
the dying, even at the risk of shortening their days, can be morally in
conformity with human dignity if death is not willed as either an end or a
means, but only foreseen and tolerated as inevitable.
In closing, It
is always unfair to directly kill an unborn child; the unborn have no say in
what happens to them, and whatever interests are placed above theirs are done
so in a biased and self-serving way. But this is not true in most cases of
physician assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia:
in some cases death really is
what the patients desire and what they ask for. This does not mean that they are right in
desiring and asking, nor that it would be right to comply; but it does indicate
that the wrongness of euthanasia cannot exclusively be the wrong of unfairness
to the person killed. This is a decision I should be able to make
for myself – not you make for me.